I am a practicing Catholic.
As such, I look to the official teaching of my church to help guide me
on making difficult decisions. It wasn’t
always this way, but my faith has grown exponentially since beginning our quest
for parenthood. That said, I recently
noticed something interesting on one of the forms from the clinic where we will
be transferring our adopted embryos.
What I commonly have come to know as an “FET”, or frozen embryo
transfer, was being referred to as a "cryo-IVF".
I did a double take because we are not doing in-vitro
fertilization. That’s what I’ve been
explaining to my Catholic friends when explaining that I really am following our
church’s teachings. Yet according to my
clinic, what we are doing is a type of IVF.
Perhaps this is mere semantics. There is no question that our embryos were
indeed created during an in-vitro fertilization procedure. But we had nothing to do with that part. They were subsequently cryopreserved and
stored for eight years. Again, that was
not our choice. Finally, they are
getting ready to be thawed and transferred where they belong – to a mother’s
womb. This is the part we take full
responsibility for.
I suppose cryopreservation and thawing is simply a delay of
what is otherwise an IVF cycle. Our
embryos were created on the same day as their genetic sibling, who was
transferred without ever having been frozen, and who was born to our donors
nine months later. Our embryos will
likewise end up in a woman’s uterus, and hopefully, just like their genetic
sibling, they will be born. So really, they just took a
detour.
What difference does it make anyway, if we call what we are
doing IVF or not? For some people, what
a procedure is called makes no difference.
However, when the difference is between being a faithful Catholic and
not, then the name matters.We did not purposefully create these embryos outside the
human body. We did not freeze them in
time, saving them to be “used” at a later date.
While I completely sympathize with families who make these decisions, according
to my own conscience, I agree with the reasons behind why the Catholic church
teaches against both of these procedures.
It’s not so much about “playing God”, which I so simplistically used to
call it. The Catholic church teaches
that mothers and fathers are co-creators with God – what an amazing
responsibility! It is impossible to bring about a human being without the breath
of God.
So no, the Church doesn’t oppose IVF and cryopreservation
because it lets humans do what only God can do, because it is God’s will to
share in His creativity! Rather, it’s about treating human beings as if they
were commodities to be manipulated and utilized according to our own whims and
conveniences.
Technically, there is always the
possibility of equipment malfunctioning or staff error that could result in the
accidental destruction of the embryos once created. They must be entrusted to the care of the
fertility clinic where they are created, even if for only a few days, before
being transferred to the mother’s womb.
Furthermore, when creating more embryos than can safely be
transferred back in a fresh cycle, cryopreservation becomes necessary. With this comes the additional risk of a
labeling mishap that could theoretically result in embryos being transferred to
the wrong woman. Even if this worst-case
scenario doesn’t happen, what does take place as a matter of course is that
parents decide that they are finished building their families and no longer
choose to come back for the remainder of the embryos they created.
This is a difficult observation. If it weren’t for a couple doing precisely
this, we wouldn’t be in a position to be parents thanks to their generous
donation. And yet, from the perspective
of the child, their best interest would’ve been served had their genetic
parents welcomed every single one of their kids.
At any rate, yes, we are currently cycling, and yet we are
not doing IVF because we are not going to be fertilizing eggs. We are simply availing ourselves to these
embryos so that they may have the opportunity to fulfill their potential. I look forward to hopefully meeting at least
one of them later this year!
A recent nasty comment made me realize that speaking the truth is going to anger people. For years I erred on the side of being politically correct so as not to be accused of thinking of myself as somehow holier-than-thou. But with a mature faith comes the realization that there will be times when I will be accused of ugly things because someone is defensive of their own decisions.
ReplyDeleteIf I were writing about adopting a child that resulted from a rape, no one would dream of accusing me of being self-righteous by condemning the rape while at the same time availing myself to raise the child.
According to what my faith teaches, no, our donors should not have done IVF. However, since they did, what I am grateful for and what is a praise-worthy act is that they chose to give them a chance via embryo adoption rather than destroying them like so many others do in their position. But by pointing out their initial mistake, I am in no way suggesting that I am without faults. IVF is simply not one of the sins on my repertoire.
That is a fact that neither makes me better nor worse than my sisters who do IVF. It simply is what it is. A defensive reaction from a reader is a sign of a conscience at work. It may hurt my pride, but it's not about me; it's about the children being created, stored, and discarded as if they had no human dignity.